Policy Process

Policy Process CJA 580 Public Policy Issues University of Phoenix Dr. Matthew Geyer, skill May 15, 2010 Policy Process federation relies on the immoral nicety arranging to primary(prenominal)tain order within communities and to maintain a sound environment for community members. Society expects the criminal referee frame to volunteer nicety by separating the guilty from the innocent, to incapacitate dangerous individual(a)s, to promote deterrence to fairness-breaking individuals, and to rehabilitate offenders.An main(prenominal) expectation of the criminal justice transcription is to tin fair and just consequences to criminal offenders and stool to heart the offenders with reintegrating into society. Some of the expectations of the criminal justice system atomic number 18 non met therefore the purpose of this compend is to describe manners for improving the criminal justice system to meet the expectations of society. This analysis give also go out the necessa ry procedures the criminal justice system could take to make these suggestions an actual policy.The current criminal justice policies are inclined to punish offenders as a method of crime subdue and crime bar (Ameri flock Bar link Criminal Justice arranging Improvements. , n. d. ). Although penalisation is necessary for many criminal offenses and criminal offenders, a punishment is not a necessity for all crimes. In many cases in which narcotic transfers are involved, the punishment of incarceration for an extended length of season is cruel and unusual.Narcotic transfers are typically considered non-violent crimes and subsequent to incarceration, the offender is continually punished because their ability to reintegrate back into society and become law-abiding, add members of society is hindered (American Bar Association Criminal Justice System Improvements. , n. d. ). captivity is not an efficient method to deter offenders from reoffending since, following incarceration, the y are ineffective to gain successful givement because of their criminal history. Gaining successful employment s not unrealistic however employers tend not to disregard the offenders history therefore influencing the offenders decision to reoffend. umpteen narcotic offenders do not desire to break laws their main tint is monetary gain. Alternatives policies in regard to narcotic offenders should be seeed to assist them with reintegration, rehabilitation, and to actually deter them from reoffending. A possible policy to implement to keep off incarcerating non-violent offenders is implementing a program that assists offenders with education and seeking employment.A program of this order of magnitude depart give offenders the opportunity to remain connected with society and volition give them the opportunity to become successful members of society. The program may provide job training skills, education courses, and employers who are impulsive to employ individuals with a crim inal history. Not simply allow for this program benefit ex-offenders, it will also benefit the companies that hire them. The Work Opportunity levy opinion is a federal official tax credit given to companies to reduce the federal tax liability of employers to be used as an incentive for employing ex-offenders (Tax Credits, n. . ). The main objective of the policy is to provide crime control and crime prevention oppose to punishing offenders only for them to reoffend. Implementing this policy may become a challenge because of the procedures necessary to implement the policy. The first step and most important step of first this policy is compiling a list of employers willing to hire ex-offenders. For more than one reason, employers may imagine hiring an ex-offender would be mischievous to their company.However, one of the goals of this program is to provide the skills and abilities to satisfy the employers, preventing recidivism. The second step of starting this policy is propos ing the policy to policy makers. The policy will need the hold up of the community and the overall criminal justice system to be a success. The program can be a success providing it has the necessary resources. indite is an issue within the criminal justice system. Profiling, as it refers to criminal justice, includes employ gender, sex, and most commonly, race to identify an individual as a leery or possible suspect of a crime.Oftentimes, the individual is not a suspect or possible suspect and a crime may not claim even been committed however, they are judged based on the above. The issue of profiling, mainly racial profiling, is because of the criminal justice systems inability to address racial disparities. A fair criminal justice system is an expectation of society. The influence of bias and different treatment in the system should be protected against and evaluated for prosecution. Many instances occur in which an individual has been racially profiled and as a result the i ndividual has been physically, mentally, or emotionally harmed by the incident. Disparities in processing have been seen most prominently in the area of law enforcement, with documentation of widespread racial profiling in recent years. Disparities in the criminal justice system are in part a function of the interrelationship between race and class, and speculate the disadvantages faced by low-income defendants (Mauer, n. d. ). Providing a mixed criminal justice system may provide society a sense of comfort if they believe the system consists of individuals similar to them. . A policy should be implemented to employ an equal number of races within the criminal justice system.There is no absolute way to ensure employing an equal number of races will decrement racial disparities however, employing different races may return racial profiling in communities. The policy should also include the intent to prosecute individuals if it is proven that he or she profiled resulting in some f orm of harm from the incident. This policy will be a challenge to implement considering there may not be any proof of any wrongdoings however, if the incident is reviewed and evaluated, prosecutors may take the necessary steps to prosecute the individual.The most important step to implement this policy would be to involve the community and policy makers. Policy makers would have to agree to approach legislation with the policy to implement a law that would decrease racial profiling. The communitys involvement is also important. Society members can assist in ensuring individuals are prosecuted for wrongdoings by reporting mistreatment to them or reporting mistreatment of others. The current criminal justice system has issues that can be addressed by implementing different policies. The two policies described above can assist in improving the operation of the criminal justice system.Implementing a policy that will allow offenders to reintegrate back into society, rehabilitate, and to deter them from reoffending will decrease the amount of individuals incarcerated and as a result possibly decrease the amount of taxes paid by taxpayers. The policy will also provide crime control and crime prevention oppose to punishing offenders only for them to reoffend. Implementing a policy that punishes criminal justice employees for profiling is another method that can assist in improving the operation of the criminal justice system.The goal of this policy is to decrease profiling by employing different races thereof decreasing the possibility of profiling. References American Bar Association. (n. d. ). American Bar Association Criminal Justice System Improvements. Retrieved from American Bar Association http//www. abanet. org/poladv/ change/2008dec_crimjustice. pdf Mauer, M. (n. d). Racial Disparities and Criminal Justice. Fdch Congressional Testimony, Retrieved From Masterfile Premier Database. National H. I. R. E Network. (n. d. ). Tax Credits. Retrieved from National H. I. R. E Network http//www. hirenetwork. org/admin/clearinghouse. php? state_id=NC