The unemployment problem and possible solutions

The un conflict problem and possible solutionsUn engagement is a residual and individual problem which effect on al unitedly economy. By late the 1980s un concern becomes a big polity and public consensus for the G5 countries (UK, USA, Japan, France and Germ both). It continued argue that among the G5 countries the direct of UK economy was an economy of Unemployment with all the kind and economic waste and in efficiency such(prenominal) as an economy entails. In view of the rapid rise in unemployment that has occurred between 1990 and 1991. nevertheless recently the UK has lower unemployment rate than France and Germany. However a number of logical sentiment trying to apologise the policy of unemployment evaluate and address the solution of Unemployment.UnemploymentUnemployment defined as the numbers of flock of working age who atomic number 18 able and available for work at current enlist rate and who do not have a job. notwithstanding the unemployment rank in the propo rtion of jobless great deal in the economically active in boil force.Unemployment Rates calculated by number of un apply/number of economical active X100.There is two basic ways government fag end measure the unemployment rates such asThe Claimant Count means the number of people when claiming their unemployment benefit from government on any given period time. comminute Force Surveys by this survey government count number of employed including number of unemployed people. accord to Labour Force survey the graph shows that in 1990 unemployment rates f be at just over 6% where employment rates picked at just under 76%. Currently (source IMF) UK unemployment rates more than 8% whereas Germany holds well above 10% unemployment rates.Zero Unemployment RatesIt is dependable that the economy unemployment rate could not at zero if an economic expert amply employment because there are two type of unemployment exist in our economy such asStructural UnemploymentIt occurs when consumer expect for the newfound product. For example when new technological progress has made skills blockage such as computer introduced innocence collar disappeared.Frictional UnemploymentIt occurs when for the particular skill read for task and run for labour are not match or people are not aware for the job opportunity or geographic match of workers ongoing answer.Besides those reason unemployment could not zero for some institutional phenomenon such asMinimum wage law may make it too expensive to hire a wasted labourGovernment employment benefit reduce job interestGovernment restriction on institution may reduce job arability.Racism or gender discrimination may precipitate interest of job. etcHowever there are numbers of principal develops of thought in macroeconomics falseered the cause of unemployment such asClassical popular opinionKeyness ThoughtNeo -Classical ThoughtMonetarism Thought untried classical ThoughtNew Keynesian ThoughtClassical ThoughtThe classical thought assumed that the economy would carry to in full equilibrium if left its own. According classical theory, labour market operated demand of labour and bestow of labour when balanced by price signals.From the graph shown that there is unemployment exist when excess labour ply (N2) and demand of labour (N3). The classical school of thought explain that if excess labour supply innovation in economy, wages would downslope(W1 to W*) until the labour market clearing equilibrium is restore, alternatively when excess labour demand existence labour shortage would push up wages and restore the equilibrium(NFull).Says Law is warrant the classical view and law said that supply creates its own demand. That means the economy is in a permanent state of full-employment equilibrium. Because says law guarantees any growth in output of goods and services willing exchange for sufficient demand and therefore firm will never reduce output or press the jobs. However, if there is unemployment, mar ket forces should quickly eliminate it and restore equilibrium.But after 1929-33 great depression the building block world economy collapsed in industrial capitalism and the classical school of theory could not explain the established economic wisdom. This depression eventually gave to raise Keynesian thought.Keynesian ThoughtKeynes his most known work The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936) argued that could not settle at Equilibrium and it would not change the labour market situation because of aggregate demand. If aggregate demand fell, output and employment could get down and the economy could become trapped in a less than full-employment equilibrium.The graph shows that when demand for labour fall (D1 to D2) the wage also fall (W to W1) and unemployment would formed (ab).Nevertheless 1970s continuous unemployment and metrics failed the Keynesians demand unequal unemployment and this argument considered as Keynesians two analytical frame works such as th e 45 tip model and the Philips wriggle which is known as a Neo- classical theory.Neo Classical ThoughtAccording the neo classical thought the 45 degree demonstrates the Keynesian aggregate demand .It means to apply the appropriate fiscal policy if aggregate demand add and reduce the economy fall in inflection pressure. More precisely where output and employment are below their full employment level if government cut tax or prouder government expenditure which is increases the aggregate demand. On the otherwise hand where output and employment are at their full employment level if government increase tax or decrease government expenditure in this situation demand- pull inflationary pressures are exists. Therefore the aggregate demand management will maintain the economy at close to full employment equilibrium both unemployment and inflection need be a problem.The graphs show that if aggregate demand fall a positive demand shock occurred at full employment equilibrium mail servi ce (Ye) and mean dapple inflationary gap existed in economy.Conversely the 45 degree aggregate demand says that the unemployment and inflection not appeared in same time. In the late 1950s Philips twist more purify the Keynesian thought. In 1958 Professor A.W.Philips illustrated a statistical kinship between unemployment and inflectionThe Philips curve shows the inverse relationship between unemployment rates and inflection. It argued that if government wants to reduce unemployment it has to accept higher inflation as a business deal off.The graphs shows that if unemployment rates fall (1.5% to 1%) inflation rates up (2 to 4%)SAlthough in 1970s the Philips curve was unable to explain the problem of unemployment and inflection which is going up together stagflation. In mean while time two economists Milton Friedman and Edwards Phelps appeared with monetarism theory that able to show concurrently inflection and unemployment based on expectations augment Philips curve.MonetarismProf essor Friedman argued that there were a series of different Philips curve for each level of expect inflection. He persuaded that when government injects resources into the economy once again the unemployment fall in short-term but there would occurred high inflation. As a result people expected inflection to occur then they would anticipate and expected a correspondingly higher wage rise.The graph revealed that unemployment below Un to U* the series of Philips curve (SRPC1) travel alone with inflation rates zero to 4% because the expectation has been changed and people adept new rates.But Friedman failed to long term unemployment related with inflation rates which is elaborated by New Classical viewed.New Classical ThoughtRobert Locus who is one of the new classical economist argued that announced and unannounced fiscal and monetary policy are affected on out and employment because of native rate of unemployment will alter the equilibrium and this thought actually expand the ration al expectation.The graph shows without short term reducing of unemployment (Un to U*) rational agent would anticipated an inflationary environment.New Keynesian ThoughtThe new Keynesian thought wrecked the long run Philips curve which is breakdown by Friedman depends on NAIRU (Non Accelerating inflation rates of unemployment). In Behavioural theory George Akerlof argued at the low level of inflation permanent trade off between inflation and unemployment because low inflation not silent.In the diagram shows when unemployment fall from U a silent inflation becomes higher.Furthermore according New Keynesian point of view real wage rate could establish long unemployment equilibrium.The diagram exposed that a higher market clearing efficiency wage paid consequent unemployment (N2-N1) whereas aggregate demand shock shifting the labour demand curve which is lead the unemployment ( N2 to N3).Most Satisfactory Explanation on nature of European UnemploymentThe classical thought believed that supply automatically creates full employment and efficient market economy drive the unemployment problem where a bantam need of government interference. But 1929-33 great depression pushed the European unemployment rates to unprecedented level and whole economy collapsed.Country1921-291930-38United States7.926.1United Kingdom1215.4France3.810.2Germany9.221.8The table shows the percentage of unemployment rates of European countries during depression period. In 1930-38 USA enjoyed high Unemployed rates 26.1%The depression eventually gave to raise the Cambridge economist John Maynard Keynes thought and he identified the root of the problem as a privation of aggregated demand. He explained that if aggregate demand fall the economy were hit by adverse shocks which create a fall the business confidence where Says law would failed to hold as firms cut investment, output and employment and this process could leave the economy in less than full unemployment equilibrium. furthermore a les s than full-employment output would look just enough demand for that output and the economy would be stuck in a slump.Keynes suggested that government onset stabilized the policy for settle the level of output and full employment. Despite the fact that until 1970s the Keynesian aggregate demand management dominated western policymaking the economy in of overheating and facing the inflationary pressured.In1970s inflation rates increase 10% to more the 20%. The graph shows that after 1970 inflation rates in UK and Japan reached at well above 20% whereas USA and France more than 15% butt Germany enjoyed the less inflationary rates. In the mean while time G5 countries were suffered by high unemployment. From the following graphs we can see that in 1970s unemployment rates increased rapidly where full employment appear however 2.5% .In 1970s economy are experienced by rising unemployment and inflation which made together stagflation where Keynesian policy failed to explain the new d ilemma. On the other hand Keynesian appeared that most unemployment rescind outside labour market but the great depression and early 1980s and 1990s corner Keynesian view unsuccessful to explain Frictional and Structural unemployment. Conversely Friedman views clear the all of Keynesians amazement which is based on expectations augmented Philips curve. Because 1970s stagflation redundant the Philips curve. Whereas Friedman indentified that the cause of inflation is balanced by the natural rate of unemployment and this unemployment occurred inside labour market which should be in microeconomic nature, cause macroeconomic policy not affective in the long run. He also argued the stabilization policy which was driven the position war boom means it ineffective to maintain the economics at potential GDP and full employments and it should be destabilized cause economic will stable inherently. Yet Monetarist assumption abandoned the1980s and 1990s break and in monetarist view labour m arket are not flexible even though the lack of competitiveness has obsessed the real wage. After all in my point of view the Keynesian school thought likely approach than other school of thought though monetarist would favour to abandon the stagflation. But if we see the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s inflation and unemployment is high but overall GDP rate remarkable. In addition Keynesian view is applicable in recent recession. Recently viewed that the Europe countries aggregated demand fall and lower rates of growth people are less interest to consume which bleed to increased unemployment hand .Besides the Keynesian thought not decline fiscal and monetary policy and Labour union power to determined the wage and right.Recent Unemployment and SolutionIn UK jobless jumped by 43,000 and unemployment reached at 8%. According to IMF survey global financial crisis impact on European output and employment and it increased the recent unemployment. In Germany, UK output falls in significantly whic h reduced the growth of employment. Moreover labour market flexibility, mainly the higher level of employment protection lean to reduced employment inflow and outflow and declines the labour reallocation. Further more rapid rise of structural unemployment, financial institutions collapse, trimming hours, early retirement tend to increased the UnemploymentOn the contrary mix labour market policies and flexibilities at firm level gradually employment has adjusted in UK and Germany. It is true that time accounts smooth the Germanys employment whereas government subsides decreased the working time. But wage flexibility and government support help to outflank the UK unemployment.ConclusionAs final point unemployment is a major problem in the world economy. It is in truth difficult to bring down equilibrium position if it is not stop to increase at the initial place and in the long run unemployed not able to participate in labour market. Therefore, government should initiate the improv ing labour market by increasing work incentives, reforming the operation bear market and trade union.