Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson Essay

In A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Row cut backson, the author depicts a trans orchestrateation she undergoes during her captivity at the hands of the Indians. While her first aspiration in captivity is to end her suffering as quickly as possible by giving up on her life, Rowlandson quickly takes up the role of survivalist, determined to stay alive long enough to be released and returned back to civilization. Along the mien, however, Rowlandson compromises on aspects of her life in order to carry out this survival. As a means of surviving the ordeal of a incessantly changing environment, Rowlandson adapts her creeds regarding food, the inborn Ameri back tooths, and even the land around her to take on the panorama of a savage, similar to that of her captors, as a means of compensating with her sensed savage environment.When Rowlandson is first captured, she makes it her objective to survive the ordeal as beaver as she can, but unmatched of her earli est struggles comes with the subject of food. Rowlandson reflects on the advancement of her releaseing habits and how she went through a fundamental change in her opinion towards the food in order to sustain herself But now that was exquisite to me that one would think was enough to turn the stomach of a wolf creature. (153) Here Rowlandson succinctly compares her own tastes to that of a brute creature, the sort of description she would normally reserve for one of the Native Americans. This quote comes on the heels of stories of Rowlandson eating horse liver and different nuts and meats that were completely outlander to her tastes. In her desperation, however, Rowlandson begins to con fountr anything that brings her nourishment and sustenance as savory, and in her ravenous and desperate state she separates herself from the presumably civilized reader by labeling them as one. From Rowlandsons perspective, it is not a given that the food she was forced to eat would be unfit to eat, but that opinion would tho stem from the perspective of one who was living in civilization.Another example of how we see Rowlandsons perspective shift to be more savage is the flair she perceives her Native American captors, particularly the ascertain to which she belongs. When first captured she witnesses the Indians destroying her village and murdering her family, and so perceives them to be barbarous creatures. (141) However, we see a surprising turnaround of sen sequencents towards them when she later references her master in the Twelfth Remove. But a sore time of trial, I concluded, I had to go through, my master being gone, who seemed to me the best friend that I had of an Indian (155) Rowlandson goes so far as to actually call one of the Indians her friend. The identical people who she constantly refers to as base and uncivilized, she claims to have unquestionable a relationship with. She withal notably refers to a sore time of trial, an illusion to the struggles s he has undergone in crafting this relationship, in developing this mindset. Rowlandson points out the process that transform her opinions at that time.Rowlandsons final, and perhaps most clear, transformation comes in the form of her perception of the wilderness and the environment in which she is traveling. At the onset of her captivity, she refers to the wilderness as desolate and vast. She laments the journey and leaving her home and civilization as she describes the bitterness of her spirit that she had at this departure. (142) However, shortly after she departs, her opinion one time again changes. Upon hearing that the Indians buried her dead son, she describes her feelings upon visiting his burial spot. past they went and showed me where it was, where I saw the ground was newly digger, and there they told me they had buried it. at that place I left that child in the wilderness, and must commit it, and myself also in this wilderness-condition, to Him who is above all. (144) Here Rowlandson explicitly describes the altered state she can tell that she is in, this wilderness-condition, and the way that she rationalizes the close of her infant and leaving him buried in the middle of nowhere as a product of her wilderness-condition. The very same sentence demonstrates a product of this condition, referring to her very son as that child. The impersonal, no-relationship way she refers to her own flesh and blood is how she compensates with her situation, and its this condition that makes her react the way she does.The changes that Rowlandson undergoes during her travels transform her views and opinions to be more in line with those of the Native Americans with whom she is a captive, and she uses this transformation of views as a coping mechanism throughout her journey. Rowlandson, whether wittingly or not, identifies that the people who are so adept at manipulation the harsh conditions of constant travel and living in an uncivilized land are the Native Ameri cans themselves, and so her views change to be more corresponding theirs.She begins to accept the foods they eat as tasteful, the Natives themselves as people instead of patently savages, and the harsh realities of the environment and the detachment of natures cruelty regarding the death of her son with a detached manner. It is interesting to note that her religious side only gets stronger throughout her captivity, and she never loses her faith. This results in an interesting dichotomy amongst her gradual adaptation to a survivalist lifestyle and her strongly rooted faith, only further showing how remarkable her continued faith was.